-
Federal
Trade Commission. In the Matter of Educational Research Center of
America, Inc., Student Marketing Group, Inc., Marian Sanjana and Jan
Stumacher. COMPLAINT
and AGREEMENT
CONTAINING CONSENT ORDER. (File no. 022-3249). January 29, 2003.
- _____. In
the Matter of the National Research Center for College and University
Admission, Inc., American Student List, LLC, and Don Munce. COMPLAINT
and DECISION
AND ORDER. (No. C-4071). January 29, 2003.
- _____.
United States v. Hershey Foods Corporation. COMPLAINT
and CONSENT
DECREE AND ORDER. Middle
District of Pennsylvania, February 27, 2003.
- _____.
United State v. Mrs. Fields Famous Brands, Inc. COMPLAINT
and CONSENT
DECREE AND ORDER. District of Utah, Central Division, February 27,
2003.
- _____.
RESPONSE
TO PETITION FILED PURSUANT TO 16 CFR [SECTION]1.25 REGARDING PORTIONS
OF THE AMENDMENTS TO THE TELEMARKETING SALES RULE, 16 CFR, PART 310.
Washington DC: FTC, March 14, 2003.
- _____.
RESPONSE
TO REQUEST FOR STAY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE TELEMARKETING SALES
RULE. Washington DC: FTC, March 14, 2003.
-
The
Attorneys General of Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado,
Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri,
Montana,Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North
Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto
Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota,Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont,
Virgin Islands, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, the
District of Columbia Corporation Counsel and the Hawaii Office of
Consumer Protection. COMMENTS
TO THE FTC REGARDING GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY PRIVACY NOTICES. Washington,
DC: NAAG, February 15, 2002.
- Electronic
Privacy Information Center v. Transportation Security Adminstration
and Department of Transportation. COMPLAINT
FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. District of Columbia, December 2002.
- Federal
Trade Commission. In the Matter of ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, a corporation.
COMPLAINT and
AGREEMENT CONTAINING
CONSENT ORDER. (File no. 012 3214). January 18, 2002.
- Federal
Trade Commission v. Paula L. Garrett, d/b/a Discreet Data Systems. FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF and
STIPULATED
FINAL JUDGMENT. Civil Action No. H-01-1255, Southern District of
Texas, Houston Division, March 8, 2002.
- Federal
Trade Commission v. Victor L. Guzzetta, d/b/a Smart Data Systems. STIPULATED
FINAL JUDGMENT. Civil Action No. 01-2335(DGT), Eastern District
of New York, March 8, 2002.
- Federal
Trade Commission v. Information Search, Inc and David J. Kacala. FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF and
STIPULATED
FINAL JUDGMENT. Civil No. AMD-01-1121, District of Maryland, Northern
Division, March 8, 2002.
- _____.
United States of America v. The Ohio Art Company. COMPLAINT
FOR CIVIL PENALTIES, INJUNCTIVE, AND OTHER RELIEF and CONSENT
DECREE. Northern District of Ohio, Western Division. April 22, 2002.
- Federal
Trade Commission v. 564196 B.C. LTD DBA, International Brokers LTD,
Darren James Danbrook, Clifford Eric Edwards and Iyhab I.S. El-Jabsheh.
COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE
AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF. Western District of Washington at Seattle,
June 10, 2002.
- Federal
Trade Commission v. D&C National Holdings LTD, First British National
Holdings LTD, Omid Tahvili, Derrick Squires and Reginald Pal. COMPLAINT
FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF. Western District of Washington
at Seattle, June 10, 2002.
- Federal
Trade Commission v. Efficient Telesales Services Inc, and Leonora Khan.
COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF. Northern District of Illinois,
Eastern Division, June 10, 2002.
- Federal
Trade Commission v. Royal Flush System Network, Inc., ECAPS Credit Solutions
Network, Inc., Globallot Services, Inc., Flash Productions, Inc., Wilson
Okike, Basil Steeves and Natty Osemwengie. COMPLAINT
FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION and STIPULATED
FINAL JUDGMENT. Western District of Washington at Seattle, June
10, 2002.
- Qwest
Communications. Qwest
Communications Withdraws Plan to Share Private Customer Account Information
Within Company. Helena, MT: EPIC, January 28, 2002.
-
The
Attorneys General of Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado,
Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada,
New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina,
Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina,
South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia,
Wisconsin, Wyoming, US Virgin Islands, the District of Columbia
Corporation Counsel and the Administrator of the Georgia Governor’s
Office of Consumer Affairs. COMMENTS
IN THE MATTER OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS’ USE OF PROPRIETARY
NETWORK INFORMATION. Before the Federal Trade Commission. Washington
DC: NAAG, December 21, 2001.
- Center
for Democracy and Technology. IN
THE MATTER OF ADVANTAGE MORTGAGE, AMERIWEST MORTGAGE, CENTRAL NEW
ENGLAND MORTGAGE, GM MORTGAGE AND ONLINE MORTGAGE CORPORATION. COMPLAINT
AND REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION AND RELIEF. Before the Federal Trade
Commission. Washington DC: CDT, August 29, 2001.
- Electronic
Privacy Information Center. IN
THE MATTER OF MICROSOFT CORPORATION. COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION
AND OTHER RELIEF. Before the Federal Trade Commission. Washington
DC: EPIC, July 26,2001.
- _____.
IN
THE MATTER OF MICROSOFT CORPORATION. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS IN SUPPORT
OF PENDING COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION AND OTHER RELIEF.
Before the Federal Trade Commission. Washington DC: EPIC, August 15,
2001.
- Electronic
Privacy Information Center, et al. IN
THE MATTER OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS’ USE OF PROPRIETARY
NETWORK INFORMATION. Washington DC: EPIC, November 1, 2001.
- _____.
REPLY
TO COMMENTS IN THE MATTER OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS’ USE
OF PROPRIETARY NETWORK INFORMATION. Washington DC: EPIC, November
16, 2001.
- Federal
Trade Commission. GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY
ACT (SUBTITLE A): DISCLOSURE OF NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION: COMMISSION
RESPONSE TO NORTH DAKOTA PETITION FOR DETERMINATION WHETHER NORTH
DAKOTA DISCLOSURE OF CUSTOMER INFORMATION LAW IS SUPERSEDED, ALTERED,
OR AFFECTED BY SUBTITLE A. Washington DC:FTC, June 28, 2001.
- _____.
UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA V. LISA FRANK, INC, COMPLAINT and CONSENT
DECREE. Eastern District of Virginia. October 2, 2001.
- Division
of Advertising Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission. AMAZON.COM
AND ALEXA INTERNET CLOSING LETTER. Washington DC: FTC, May 25,
2001.
- Bureau
of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission.
RE: PETITION REQUESTING INVESTIGATION OF AND ENFORCEMENT ACTION AGAINST
AMAZON.COM Washington DC: FTC, May 24, 2001.
- United
States of America v. Bigmailbox.Com, Inc., et al. COMPLAINT
FOR CIVIL PENALTIES, INJUNCTIVE, AND OTHER RELIEF and CONSENT
DECREE. Eastern District of Virginia. April 19, 2001.
- United
States of America v. Looksmart, Ltd. COMPLAINT
FOR CIVIL PENALTIES, INJUNCTIVE, AND OTHER RELIEF and CONSENT
DECREE. Eastern District of Virginia. April 19, 2001.
- United
States of America v.
Monarch Services, Inc., et al. COMPLAINT
FOR CIVIL PENALTIES, INJUNCTIVE, AND OTHER RELIEF and CONSENT
DECREE. District of Maryland. April 19, 2001.
- Federal
Trade Commission. As
Part of “Operation Detect Pretext” FTC Sues to Halt “Pretexting”
Washington DC: FTC, April 18, 2001.
- Federal
Trade Commission v.
Victor L. Guzzetta d/b/a Smart Data Systems. COMPLAINT
and TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER. Civil Action No. CV 01 2335, Eastern District
of New York. April 18, 2001.
- Federal
Trade Commission
v. Information Search, Inc., and David Kacala. COMPLAINT
and TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER. Civil Action No. AMD-01-1121, District of Maryland,
Northern Division. April 18, 2001.
- Federal
Trade Commission v. Paula
L. Garrett d/b/a Discreet Data Systems. COMPLAINT
and TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER. Civil Action No. H 01-1255, Southern District
of Texas, Houston Division. April 18, 2001.
1999
1998
State
and Provincial
Arizona
Michigan
- Attorney
General of Michigan.
Ameritech Asked to Clarify Privacy Notices, and Warning Issued
to Customers. Lansing, MI: AG, January 15, 2002.
- _____.
Ameritech
Urged to Follow Qwest’s
Privacy Lead. Lansing, MI: AG, February 1, 2002.
- State
of Michigan v. Ortho Biotech. NOTICE OF INTENDED ACTION FOR INADEQUATE PRIVACY POLICIES.
June 12, 2000.
- State
of Michigan v. AmericasBaby. NOTICE OF INTENDED ACTION. June 12, 2000.
- State
of Michigan v. Stockpoint. NOTICE OF INTENDED ACTION. June 12, 2000.
- State
of Michigan v. iFriends. NOTICE OF INTENDED ACTION. June 12, 2000.
Minnesota
- State
of Minnesota v. US Bancorp. US District Court, District of Minnesota.
COMPLAINT. June 1999.
|
